<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Lightroom 3 Beta: Develop Module</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.pointsinfocus.com/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-develop-module/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.pointsinfocus.com/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-develop-module/</link>
	<description>Focusing on better photography</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 07 Feb 2012 18:25:41 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: V. J. Franke</title>
		<link>http://www.pointsinfocus.com/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-develop-module/comment-page-1/#comment-1221</link>
		<dc:creator>V. J. Franke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 03:28:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointsinfocus.com/?p=2765#comment-1221</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s one I haven&#039;t seen. I can&#039;t seem to reproduce it either.

I&#039;m half tempted to say it&#039;s a bug since this is beta software and that&#039;s the easy out. 

At the same time, I can&#039;t seem to reproduce it so I&#039;m wondering if maybe it&#039;s taking a long time to load the new preview or not loading an updated preview at all. 

If you make a full resolution export is it sharpened properly? That should have the full processing applied, even if the library module is only showing a preview image.

You might also to try purging the cache, 1:1 previews and optimizing the catalog.

I&#039;d also see if anyone else has reported something similar at the official &lt;a href=&quot;http://forums.adobe.com/community/labs/lightroom3/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Adobe Labs LR3 Beta discussion form&lt;/a&gt;. If not you might want to report it there and see if anyone has any other ideas.

Wish I could be more help on this one.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s one I haven&#8217;t seen. I can&#8217;t seem to reproduce it either.</p>
<p>I&#8217;m half tempted to say it&#8217;s a bug since this is beta software and that&#8217;s the easy out. </p>
<p>At the same time, I can&#8217;t seem to reproduce it so I&#8217;m wondering if maybe it&#8217;s taking a long time to load the new preview or not loading an updated preview at all. </p>
<p>If you make a full resolution export is it sharpened properly? That should have the full processing applied, even if the library module is only showing a preview image.</p>
<p>You might also to try purging the cache, 1:1 previews and optimizing the catalog.</p>
<p>I&#8217;d also see if anyone else has reported something similar at the official <a  href="http://forums.adobe.com/community/labs/lightroom3/" rel="nofollow">Adobe Labs LR3 Beta discussion form</a>. If not you might want to report it there and see if anyone has any other ideas.</p>
<p>Wish I could be more help on this one.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: David McIver</title>
		<link>http://www.pointsinfocus.com/2009/10/lightroom-3-beta-develop-module/comment-page-1/#comment-1220</link>
		<dc:creator>David McIver</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Nov 2009 01:57:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.pointsinfocus.com/?p=2765#comment-1220</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m losing all of my sharpening from develop mode when I switch to library mode to export.  Any idea what I&#039;m doing wrong or is that a bug in version 3?
 Thanks,
  David</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m losing all of my sharpening from develop mode when I switch to library mode to export.  Any idea what I&#8217;m doing wrong or is that a bug in version 3?<br />
 Thanks,<br />
  David</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

